OpEx90

The current page distinguishes an eight-hour Yellow Belt, a 40-hour Green Belt, and an 80-hour Black Belt. Yellow Belt introduces process thinking, waste, DMAIC, and basic problem solving. Green Belt adds project leadership, data analysis, root cause, stakeholder engagement, and control plans, while Black Belt addresses more complex improvement and change leadership.

AI is framed as assistance for analysis, documentation, brainstorming, communication, and workflows rather than a replacement for judgment. That is a specific addition to the process-improvement positioning. Ask how those tools appear in exercises and how the training handles the organization’s own data before assuming the AI label identifies one standardized software curriculum.

Yellow Belt instruction is listed at eight hours, Green Belt at 40, and Black Belt at 80. The academy also describes team cohorts, live workshops, and project coaching. That current offering is broader than the older self-paced classification, which should not be assumed to describe every engagement now available.

Those stated hours establish the scale of instruction at each level, but not the exact calendar for a customized team. Delivery dates, session length, project work, and coaching need to be agreed in the actual proposal.

For an employer, allocate time for applying the methods between sessions rather than assuming attendance alone resolves a process problem. The page explicitly emphasizes follow-through and work-based examples. Ask who participates in coaching, whether managers are involved, and how the timetable accommodates the operational work the training is intended to improve.

No named accreditation or detailed certification assessment is established on the current overview. Belt terminology organizes the training levels, but does not by itself show who issues the award, what must be passed, or whether a project is formally assessed.

Before buying for a credential requirement, obtain the exact certificate and evaluation conditions. The academy’s practitioner-led positioning may be useful for applied learning, yet it should not be converted into an external accreditation claim. An employer seeking a particular recognized belt should compare that requirement with the proposed training rather than accept a familiar title as sufficient evidence.

The current academy overview does not display tuition. Older OpEx90 prices reported by partners were not confirmed against the present official offering and are not used here. Request a proposal for the training being offered now rather than budgeting from a legacy package name.

The team-oriented presentation suggests requesting a proposal matching the intended scope, because OPEX90 does not publish a per-seat price, a minimum group size or financing terms. Ask the provider to separate instruction, customization, project coaching, and any assessment in the quote.

Cancellation, refund, and rescheduling conditions are absent from the overview examined. For a group, also ask how participant changes or a stalled workplace project affect the agreement. Compare the written proposal with equivalent live or mentored training instead of using an old self-paced amount as the benchmark for a customized team engagement.

Dan Feliciano Academy fits a team that can bring a real operational problem into training and wants examples aligned with its work. The page’s emphasis on ownership, action plans, and control plans may be especially relevant when sustaining improvements matters as much as learning analytical tools.

Skip an individual purchase based only on legacy OpEx90 pricing or a presumed self-paced package. A buyer who needs an instantly available, fully documented online certificate may find Leanscape easier to evaluate. An organization requiring named accreditation should resolve that condition before commissioning customized instruction.

• Work-based teaching: The academy describes practitioner-led training built around actual operational tasks.
• Visible belt outlines: Yellow, Green, and Black Belt content and instructional hours are published.
• AI as a supporting tool: Analysis, documentation, and follow-through incorporate AI assistance.
• A changed offering: The OpEx90 brand now leads to a different academy presentation, so legacy product details may no longer apply.
• Incomplete enrollment terms: Current tuition, accreditation, assessment, and refund rules are not established by the overview.

The strongest feature is the ability, according to the academy, to tailor examples, exercises, project coaching, and leadership alignment to an organization’s work. That can make training more relevant than a generic sequence if the engagement is clearly scoped. Published belt hours also provide a useful starting point for discussing commitment.

The weakness is purchase transparency for an individual comparing standardized courses. Current prices and assessment terms are absent, while the older brand and URLs can create confusion about what is still offered. The review therefore remains cautious: the practical training proposition is identifiable, but its cost and credential value cannot be ranked confidently without a current proposal.

6Sigma.us Lean Six Sigma Green Belt offers a more concrete starting point for scheduled training, with virtual instructor-led tuition at $2,950 and a detailed syllabus. Live and on-site routes involve about two weeks in two four-day blocks; self-paced instruction is described as 30 hours, with a project for project certification. A current self-paced price could not be established, and an older low estimate is not treated as verified tuition. The company states IACET and ISSSP accreditation and offers several delivery formats.

Leanscape Online Lean Six Sigma Green Belt is easier to evaluate as a solo learner’s fixed package: €999 upfront, three monthly payments of €366, or six of €192. Its five-day in-person option is €1,650, with prices shown in EUR/GBP and no verified USD amount. Online study lists 40 learning hours, 50 modules, one real project, and 12 months of access with mentoring and a CPD-accredited certificate. Project revisions may need time beyond the lesson estimate, so compare the application support as well as the defined price.

The Six Sigma Certification category includes both standardized courses and this team-oriented offer. Our review methodology explains the curriculum, credibility, value, flexibility, and support criteria used when evaluating Dan Feliciano Academy’s current presentation.

Use Train the Team or the inquiry controls for the relevant belt on the academy’s current page. The site invites a discussion of the engagement rather than providing a fully priced checkout for every level. Prepare the team’s learning objective before using that route so the proposal can address the intended work.

Request a proposal specifying participants, hours, calendar, examples, project coaching, assessment, certificate, total price, and cancellation terms. Confirm whether any legacy OpEx90 course purchase remains available before relying on an old link. Choose the level according to the team’s project responsibility and existing knowledge, not solely the prestige of the belt name.

Current Dan Feliciano Academy information and Six Sigma comparison pages consulted October 5, 2026: source 1, source 2, source 3.